Skip to main content
Advertisement

Call-Blocking Firm Fined £190,000 for Making 758,000 Nuisance Calls

Elderly Aids Ltd, which sold call-blocking devices, has been fined £190,000 for making 758,053 nuisance calls to elderly people registered with the Telephone Preference Service between May 2024 and February 2025. The ICO found the company targeted vulnerable people who had explicitly opted out of...

By The UK Pulse Editorial Team··4 min read·How we work
Two call centre workers wearing headsets at a desk with a screen on it

Elderly Aids Ltd, a company that marketed itself as a protector of older people from unwanted telephone contact, has been penalised £190,000 by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) for conducting a campaign of hundreds of thousands of cold calls—the very practice it claimed to shield customers from.

Between May 2024 and February 2025, the firm made 758,053 unsolicited marketing calls to individuals registered with the Telephone Preference Service (TPS), a national opt-out system designed to prevent unwanted sales contact. According to the ICO's enforcement notice, the company targeted people who had explicitly requested not to receive such calls while attempting to sell call-blocking devices.

The ICO received approximately 20 complaints during this period from both the regulator and the TPS itself. Complainants reported that callers employed aggressive tactics, made misleading statements, and frequently failed to identify themselves or their employer. One person described how the company's representatives persuaded an elderly relative to purchase services by charging £139 upfront plus a recurring £6.99 monthly subscription for call-blocking capabilities the firm was not authorised to provide.

How did the company respond to the investigation?

When the ICO initiated its investigation, Elderly Aids Ltd demonstrated what regulators characterised as systematic non-compliance. The company repeatedly disregarded requests for information while continuing to place cold calls to potential customers. Most significantly, once the company became aware of the regulatory scrutiny, it attempted to dissolve itself by striking off from the Companies House register—a move designed to evade accountability. The firm is now registered only at a default address.

Advertisement

Andy Curry, head of investigations at the ICO, stated:

Not only did this company target vulnerable people who had explicitly asked not to be called – they harassed them to sell call-blocking devices. EAL showed a complete disregard for the law and the people they were hounding. This penalty should serve as a clear warning to any business that thinks the law does not apply to them – we will hold them to account for both exploiting people in this way and trying to avoid accountability.

What legal rules did the company break?

Under UK telecommunications law, it is illegal to make a marketing call to any person registered with the TPS unless that individual has previously given explicit permission to the specific company to contact them. Elderly Aids Ltd violated this requirement systematically across hundreds of thousands of calls. According to the ICO's public enforcement action, the company's conduct formed part of the regulator's broader crackdown on unlawful direct marketing practices.

Russell Roach, director of preference services at the Data & Marketing Association, commented on the wider implications:

Anyone making live marketing calls must respect the choices people have made about their privacy. When organisations ignore those preferences and contact individuals who have explicitly opted out of receiving unsolicited sales calls, particularly those who are most vulnerable, they undermine consumer trust and risk causing significant nuisance and distress.

What enforcement action has been taken?

In addition to the £190,000 financial penalty, the ICO has issued a formal order requiring Elderly Aids Ltd to cease all illegal marketing calls immediately. The regulator has made clear that if the company fails to pay the fine, further enforcement measures will follow, including potential director disqualification proceedings. The ICO described Elderly Aids Ltd's conduct as

bombarding people with the very nuisance calls it claimed to protect them from
, highlighting the particularly egregious nature of the violation.

This enforcement action reflects the ICO's intensified focus on nuisance marketing. The regulator has previously pursued similar cases involving telecommunications and consumer protection breaches. In July 2026, the ICO raided five companies suspected of involvement in spam car finance claim texts, seizing equipment as part of a wider investigation into nuisance marketing and motor finance mis-selling practices.

Key Facts

  • Elderly Aids Ltd made 758,053 cold calls to TPS-registered numbers between May 2024 and February 2025 while selling call-blocking devices
  • The company charged customers £139 upfront and £6.99 monthly for unauthorised call-blocking services
  • Approximately 20 complaints were lodged with the ICO and TPS, with callers reported as aggressive, misleading, and often failing to identify themselves
  • The company ignored ICO information requests and attempted to strike itself off the Companies House register once regulatory scrutiny began
  • The £190,000 fine is enforceable through director disqualification if the company does not comply

This article was sourced from theguardian

Advertisement

Related News