Saltburn’s alleged trickery caused outrage this week after a second XI cricket match against Norton in the North Yorkshire and South Durham League, but the episode also revived a wider argument about the sport’s supposed moral code. Cricket’s reputation for fair play sits uneasily beside a long history of cheating, rule-bending and convenient national myth.
What happened in the Saltburn-Norton match?
One incident has dominated this week’s sporting headlines, drawing even more column inches than Gianni Infantino’s apparent to sell the football World Cup to the highest bidder. It took place in a second XI cricket match last weekend between Saltburn and Norton in the North Yorkshire and South Durham League. A fielder at first slip was alleged to have clicked his fingers as the ball passed the batter’s bat, in an to con the umpire into thinking that there had been an edge.
The ball sank into the wicketkeeper’s gloves; bowler, keeper and fielder erupted in a full-throated appeal; and the umpire sent the disbelieving batter on his way for a duck. There the matter might have ended, but these days even second XI matches are recorded and there was footage of the alleged finger-clicking.
Over the past few days, this footage has been analysed in minute detail. One writer on The Athletic bathetically likened the of the video to the decoding of the Zapruder film of President John F Kennedy’s assassination. What precisely does it show? Could the sound have emanated from behind a grassy knoll at the Saltburn ground?
What has the club done?
The club and league have opened investigations, but, even without those inquiries being concluded, Saltburn have suspended the alleged clicker – 38-year-old Devine – and said that he will not play for the club for the foreseeable future. Sleepy Saltburn, worried about critics labelling it the “”, are taking no chances. But is the footage really definitive? What will Devine’s teammates say? The story could run and run.
Why does cricket talk so much about fair play?
“It’s not cricket”has been the hackneyed phrase rolled out in almost every iteration of this gloriously clickbaity story. But what is cricket? It’s one player hurling a dangerous projectile at another. An odd activity on which to base a moral code.
Yet, at the same time as parroting
“It’s not cricket”, pundits have been enumerating the sport’s numerous other falls from grace (and indeed the great WG Grace was a noted rule-bender) over the centuries. There was bribery and corruption in the early days, which led to games that both teams were trying to lose; numerous incidents of doctoring the ball to get it to behave in peculiar ways, the Australian “” in 2018 being the most notorious; the time-honoured reluctance of batters to walk for catches even when they know they are out; and a host of modern-day match-fixing . The
“spirit of cricket”is a fragile flower.
Why is village cricket seen as so innocent?
We have an especially rose-tinted view of village cricket, insisting that amateurs
“Play up! Play up! And play the game!”, in the words of Henry Newbolt’s
Vitaï Lampada. We imagine village cricket as the bucolic dreamworld described in Siegfried Sassoon’s recollections of prewar games (the idyll before the nightmare of the trenches), Hugh de Sélincourt’s 1924 classic
The Cricket Matchand AG Macdonell’s 1933
England, Their England. Endless summer days, resplendent rural grounds, sumptuous teas and pastoral rivalry.
But even if that vision once shimmered, it does so no longer: the beautiful old cricket ground is now a supermarket car park, English summers increasingly Saharan, and the winning-is-everything mentality that has seeped into amateur cricket all too often ends with volunteer umpires being abused and rival players exchanging jibes – or . It’s just not cricket, but then it probably never was.
