Skip to main content
Advertisement

Blanche attorney general bid stalls over disputed Trump tax settlement

Todd Blanche’s bid to become US attorney general is under pressure after Republican John Cornyn said he needs written confirmation that a disputed $1.8bn fund is dead.

·2 min read
Attorney General nominee Todd Blanche in a dark suit and red tie walks through a corridor surrounded by others

Todd Blanche’s hopes of becoming US attorney general appeared to be in jeopardy on Wednesday after the Department of Justice did not provide written assurances to a key Republican senator that a $1.8bn slush fund was dead. The Senate judiciary committee is due to vote on Thursday on whether to advance Blanche’s nomination.

Blanche, Trump’s lawyer, is already serving as acting US attorney general. He needs the vote of every Republican on the Senate judiciary panel to move his nomination forward and secure the role on a permanent basis.

Why is John Cornyn withholding support?

A swing vote on the committee, John Cornyn of Texas, told reporters on Wednesday he would not support Blanche’s nomination until he received written confirmation that the fund was not moving ahead.

Cornyn also wants clarification that a provision giving the president, his sons and related businesses blanket immunity from tax audits for all matters up until this year could not be applied to future matters, or to people who were not parties to the settlement.

Advertisement
“Maybe they think I’m just going to give up or, you know, go along, but they’re mistaken,”

Cornyn, a four-term Republican senator who lost a re-election bid earlier this year to a Trump-endorsed rival, said:

“We actually sent them a red-line strikeout of what we need, and they just need to make a decision. And if they do, then we’ll proceed with the markup tomorrow.”

What is the disputed settlement about?

The US federal government reached the agreement to resolve a $10bn lawsuit Trump filed against the IRS over the unauthorized leak of his tax returns. The deal created a $1.8bn loosely controlled fund to compensate people who say they are victims of government weaponization and gave Trump, his family and businesses blanket immunity from audits for anything filed until the agreement was reached.

The agreement immediately faced bipartisan scrutiny and outrage. The justice department did not make any effort to defend itself from the lawsuit, prompting a federal judge overseeing the case to conclude the case was brought with an

“”
.

What has Blanche said about the fund?

Under pressure, Blanche said in June that the department was scrapping the “anti-weaponization” fund, but he has repeatedly declined to say so in writing. Pressed by Cornyn during his confirmation hearing, Blanche acknowledged that Trump or the other plaintiffs in the case could try to enforce the settlement agreement. He also did not say the tax immunity provision was dead.

This article was sourced from theguardian

Advertisement

Related News