Skip to main content
Advertisement

F1 Q&A: Safety Car Finish, Verstappen's Future, and British GP Insights

Charles Leclerc won the British GP at Silverstone, with debate over the safety car finish and Max Verstappen's future at Red Bull. Insights on race regulations, lapped cars, and Red Bull's driver lineup are discussed.

·7 min read
Isack Hadjar chats to a Red Bull engineer in the garage during the British Grand Prix

Safety car software error 'frustrating'

Charles Leclerc secured a second victory for Ferrari in three races at a dramatic British Grand Prix held at Silverstone.

Mercedes' George Russell finished in second place, with Leclerc's teammate Lewis Hamilton completing the podium in third at their home event.

Kimi Antonelli, who claimed his first sprint race win on Saturday, ended the Grand Prix in 16th position due to car issues, narrowing his championship lead over Russell to 25 points.

BBC F1 correspondent Andrew Benson addresses your questions following a race that concluded under the safety car after Max Verstappen crashed out.

Did Formula 1 miss a trick with the ending of the British GP?

Should Formula 1 consider the approach used at this year's Indy 500, where the race was red-flagged to recover the car and then restarted to finish under green-flag conditions, avoiding a safety car finish? - Matthew

This is a scenario where opinions vary, each with valid points, but Formula 1 as a sport has agreed on a specific approach based on past experiences.

Ideally, for entertainment purposes, it would be preferable if races did not end behind the safety car, as such finishes can be seen as anti-climactic.

However, it is difficult to argue that the British Grand Prix lacked drama and excitement despite concluding under caution.

The core issue relates to the regulations governing the safety car and its operation.

These rules have evolved over many years and have been developed to a point where the FIA, Formula 1, and the teams are satisfied, while remaining open to future improvements.

Formula 1 has learned lessons from the 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix. At that event, it was agreed that ideally, races should not finish under a safety car.

The problem in Abu Dhabi was that the race director attempted to ensure a green-flag finish, believing it was the correct approach, but made several errors, including disregarding the rules.

There is a misconception that the race director can operate the safety car arbitrarily. In reality, they must operate within the existing rules.

Michael Masi's mistake in Abu Dhabi was to ignore this principle; the race director cannot create rules at will.

On Sunday at Silverstone, the race director could have chosen to red-flag the race when Verstappen crashed at Stowe, and some may have preferred this option.

However, if Verstappen's incident had occurred on lap 25 instead of lap 48, it is unlikely a red flag would have been issued.

Therefore, the question arises: why should a red flag be called with four laps remaining simply to avoid a safety car finish?

Sporting integrity is also a consideration. Any decision by the race director in such circumstances could influence the race outcome.

In this case, George Russell did not pit for tyres and gained a position as a result. Had the race been red-flagged, all drivers would have been allowed to change tyres, and a restart could have altered positions again.

Determining which scenario is correct or preferable is subjective, and even drivers' opinions vary depending on their circumstances.

Race-winner Charles Leclerc said: "It's not great for the fans that are here around the track. In the helmet, I was kind of happy that there was not a restart to keep that win."
Russell said: "Of course it's a shame for any race to finish under the safety car. But then you go back to Abu Dhabi '21, and that is just how racing goes.
"Nobody can plan for somebody to have an incident, and the way F1 deal with it and FIA deal with it shouldn't be any different at the end of the race compared to the start of the race.
"Obviously, there was a lot of chat post-Abu Dhabi '21. If you actually look at the number of races that have finished under the safety car over the past 20 years, it's not actually a lot. So, it is a shame, but what can you do? I don't think it should be different."
Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff said: "Sometimes it doesn't give for the most exciting finale. Certainly from a spectacle standpoint, everybody would have loved to see Lewis (Hamilton) on a soft (tyre) against us and maybe fighting with Leclerc. But this is a sport. Show follows sport and not the other way around."

Formula 1 and my autistic son - navigating noise, crowds and chaos

Why is it deemed necessary to get lapped cars past the safety car before the race resumes?

Why shouldn't lapped cars remain where they were before the safety car period? - Johnathan

The purpose of allowing lapped cars to pass the safety car is to ensure the race restarts with all cars in their correct order, enabling drivers to compete directly with their immediate rivals immediately after the restart.

If lapped cars remained between other cars, it would hinder battles for positions following a restart.

Advertisement

While this can be seen as a slight manipulation of the race's purity—since without a safety car, lapped cars would have been overtaken naturally—this rule is a compromise developed over many years and currently represents the best solution.

Do you believe that Max Verstappen is deliberately voicing his frustration clearly on team radio and in media comments as a preparation for pulling the performance-clause trigger in his contract and leaving Red Bull this year?

Is Verstappen unhappy with Red Bull's current performance? Yes, he has expressed this clearly. He wants to win.

Is he concerned about the car's inconsistent balance issues that have persisted over the past two years? Yes.

Are his team radio comments directly linked to his contract situation? It is unlikely.

Will he activate the performance clause allowing him to leave Red Bull at the end of this season? This remains unknown, including to Verstappen himself.

Could he trigger the clause due to dissatisfaction and desire to move elsewhere? Yes, but this does not imply his comments are part of a deliberate strategy to leave Red Bull.

The situation is straightforward, but the outcome is uncertain.

Verstappen aims to win races and championships. Currently, Red Bull is not in a position to facilitate that.

He is contracted until the end of 2028 but has performance clauses likely enabling him to depart at the end of this season if he chooses.

According to , the trigger point for these clauses is in October, giving him ample time to consider his options.

Verstappen and his management team—including manager Raymond Vermeulen and father Jos Verstappen—are in discussions with potential teams, including Mercedes, Ferrari, and McLaren, as well as Red Bull.

All these teams have drivers under contract for next year, but Verstappen's status makes him a compelling candidate.

Teams acknowledge he comes with complexities, but from a competitiveness standpoint, he is difficult to refuse if genuinely interested.

Verstappen has time to evaluate Red Bull's trajectory before deciding.

It is accurate that Red Bull must work to convince him they remain his best competitive option.

Red Bull's Isack Hadjar is eighth in the drivers' championship with team-mate Max Verstappen seventh

Have Red Bull quietly found the answer in Isack Hadjar to their enduring second seat problem?

Isack Hadjar is having a quietly impressive second season with Red Bull alongside Max Verstappen.

He is currently one position and 24 points behind the four-time world champion driving the same car.

Hadjar has also stood on the podium, although it was rescinded under controversial circumstances in Monaco after Pierre Gasly's penalty for pit-lane speeding was overturned.

In terms of pace, Hadjar compares well with Verstappen.

The qualifying head-to-head stands at 9-2 in Verstappen's favor in sessions where a fair comparison is possible, with a performance gap of only 0.25 seconds.

This is the closest raw performance anyone has achieved against Verstappen since Daniel Ricciardo in 2018.

Team principal Laurent Mekies said on Sunday of Hadjar: "He has been strong since the beginning of the season. He was able to do his own path and to progress race after race in terms of experience and in terms of skills.
"He is learning a lot from Max. He is learning a bit more every time he drives the car. And today was no different. He is not going to be satisfied with fifth or fourth. We are not going to be either.
"But certainly the big picture for us is that it's a step forward every time he goes out with the car. That's positive for the rest of the season."

Safety car plays decisive role again in confusing end to chaotic race

Red Bull wing failure 'super-dangerous' - Verstappen

Get in touch

Send us your question for F1 correspondent Andrew Benson

British Grand Prix Review: Charles Leclerc Shines at Silverstone

This article was sourced from bbc

Advertisement

Related News