Skip to main content
Ad (425x293)

Jo Malone Seeks Resolution in Legal Dispute Over Name Use with Estée Lauder and Zara

Jo Malone faces a lawsuit from Estée Lauder over the use of her name in a Zara collaboration. She expresses surprise and hopes for a sensible resolution, emphasizing her personal identity separate from the brand she sold in 1999.

·4 min read
PA Media Jo Malone wearing green patterned dress and necklace with a star pendant

Jo Malone Addresses Legal Dispute Over Name Usage

Jo Malone, the renowned perfume designer, expressed hope that "sense will prevail" amid a legal dispute involving herself, retailer Zara, and beauty conglomerate Estée Lauder concerning the use of her name.

Estée Lauder acquired Malone's original perfume brand, Jo Malone London, including the rights to her name, in 1999. Subsequently, Malone established a new company, Jo Loves, in 2011, which markets perfumes, candles, and toiletries.

Last month, Estée Lauder Companies initiated High Court proceedings regarding a collaboration between Jo Loves and Zara, contesting the use of Malone's name on the product packaging. The company is pursuing damages exceeding £200,000.

Speaking publicly for the first time since the lawsuit was announced, Malone described the situation as "very surprised and very sad."

In a video posted on Instagram, Malone emphasized that Jo Loves and Zara had taken extensive measures to clarify that the collaboration—originating seven years ago—was "nothing to do with Jo Malone London, the company."

"We've literally done as much as we possibly can,"
she stated.

Although the collaboration was conducted under the Jo Loves brand, Estée Lauder objected to the inclusion of Malone's name on the packaging, which read: "A creation by Jo Malone CBE, founder of Jo Loves."

Estée Lauder is pursuing legal action against Malone personally, Jo Loves, and Zara's UK division for trademark infringement and breach of contract.

The BBC has sought comment from Estée Lauder, while Zara declined to provide a statement.

"I can't stop being a person,"
Malone remarked.

She questioned the timing of Estée Lauder's lawsuit, noting that the collaboration with Zara began in 2019.

Ad (425x293)

"If it was wrong now, it would have been wrong on day one, and nobody did anything about it.
I sold a company, I did not sell myself ... those collections were created by me, the person."

Background of the Agreement and Legal Claims

Under the 1999 agreement, Malone consented not to use the "Jo Malone" name for commercial purposes, including the marketing of fragrances.

Malone has previously expressed regret over this restriction.

In the Instagram video, she indicated her willingness to defend her position in court if necessary but added:

"I hope sense will prevail and we will find a new and different way to work in the same marketplace."
"My integrity means a lot to me."

jomalonecbe / Instagram A screengrab from video of Jo Malone wearing a red and black striped top against a neutral background, with likes and share counts embedded as white graphics over the screen on the right, showing the post had 80.9k likes, 3786 comments and 14.6k shares.
Jo Malone discussed the High Court claim in a video on Instagram

Jo Malone's Career and Brand History

Born on a council estate in south-east London, Malone founded her perfume company in the early 1990s. The brand gained popularity for its distinctive fragrances inspired by British nature.

She sold the company to Estée Lauder for an undisclosed multi-million-pound sum but remained as creative director until 2006. A non-compete clause prevented her from developing new fragrance or skincare lines until 2011.

Estée Lauder's Position and Court Arguments

Court documents reveal that Estée Lauder's legal team contends the "low-cost" Zara products created by Malone "undermine" the Jo Malone London brand's reputation for luxury and exclusivity.

"Such use allows the respective defendants to benefit from the fame and reputation of the Jo Malone trademarks without having contributed to the creation of that fame and reputation."

Estée Lauder has stated that when Malone sold the brand, she agreed to clear contractual terms prohibiting use of the Jo Malone name in certain commercial contexts, including fragrance marketing.

"She was compensated as part of this agreement, and for many years, she abided by its terms.
We respect Ms Malone's right to pursue new opportunities. But legally binding contractual obligations cannot be disregarded, and when those terms are breached, we will protect the brand that we have invested in and built over decades."

This article was sourced from bbc

Ad (425x293)

Related News