High Court Dismisses Legal Challenge Against Met Police Facial Recognition
Privacy advocates have been unsuccessful in their High Court attempt to restrict the Metropolitan Police's deployment of live facial recognition (LFR) technology.
The claim was brought by youth worker Shaun Thompson and Silkie Carlo, director of the campaign group Big Brother Watch, who expressed concerns that facial recognition could be applied arbitrarily or in a discriminatory manner.
Scotland Yard defended the use of the technology, asserting to the court that its policy complies with the law.
The Metropolitan Police will continue utilizing the technology, with commissioner Sir Mark Rowley describing the ruling as an "important victory for public safety."
Misidentification and Legal Reasoning
One claimant, Shaun Thompson, was misidentified by the live facial recognition system.
Legal representatives argued that the proposed permanent installations of LFR in London would make it "impossible" for residents to move around without their biometric data being captured and processed.
Lord Justice Holgate and Mrs Justice Farbey stated in their judgment that:
"In the context of promoting law and order in a large metropolis, the policy provides the claimants with an adequate indication of the circumstances in which LFR will be used and enables them to foresee, to a degree that is reasonable in the circumstances, the consequences of travelling in an area of London where LFR is in use."
The 74-page judgment further noted that the "risk and potential scope for discrimination on grounds of race was no more than faintly asserted."
The judges concluded that the human rights of Thompson and Carlo had not been violated.
Expansion Plans and Official Responses
According to plans announced by the Home Office in January, the number of LFR-equipped vans will increase from 10 to 50, making the technology available to all police forces across England and Wales.
Met Police commissioner Sir Mark Rowley commented on the ruling:
"The courts have confirmed our approach is lawful. The public supports its use. It works. And it helps us keep Londoners safe.
The question is no longer whether we should use live facial recognition, it's why we would choose not to."
In response, Shaun Thompson stated:
"No one should be treated like a criminal due to a computer error.
I was compliant with the police but my bank cards and passport weren't enough to convince the police the facial recognition tech was wrong.
It's like stop and search on steroids. It's clear the more widely this is used, the more innocent people like me risk being criminalised."
Listeners can access BBC Radio London's best content on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, X, and Instagram. Story ideas can be sent to hello.bbclondon@bbc.co.uk.
