Landmark Trial Accuses Social Media Giants of Creating 'Addiction Machines'
The world's largest social media companies are facing accusations of engineering "addiction machines" as a significant trial commenced in California, focusing on the mental health impacts of Instagram and YouTube.
During the opening argument before Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Carolyn B. Kuhl and a jury, attorney Mark Lanier contended that his client, identified as plaintiff "K.G.M.", experienced mental health challenges due to her addiction to social media.
"These companies built machines designed to addict the brains of children, and they did it on purpose," Lanier stated.
Later in the day, lawyers representing Meta and YouTube were expected to argue that K.G.M.'s addiction was attributable to other personal issues rather than any negligence on their part.
The plaintiff will be referred to by her initials or as Kaley G.M., as the alleged harms occurred while she was a minor.
Lanier further accused Meta and YouTube of failing to warn young users about the risks associated with the design of their platforms.
To emphasize his point, Lanier used a display of children's blocks with the words "Addicting," "Brains," and "Children" adjacent to the letters A, B, and C.
"This case is about two of the richest corporations in history who have engineered addiction in childrens' brains," Lanier remarked. "I'm going to show you the addiction machine that they built, the internal documents that people normally don't get to see, and emails from [Meta CEO] Mark Zuckerberg and YouTube executives."
Lanier presented a selected excerpt from a 2015 email in which Zuckerberg demanded a "time spent increases by 12%" on Meta platforms to fulfill internal business objectives.
Regarding YouTube, Lanier asserted that the platform, owned by Google, deliberately targeted young users because it could "charge advertisers more" compared to its YouTube Kids platform.
The claimant's attorney accused YouTube of exploiting busy parents seeking a "digital babysitting service."
Monday's proceedings marked the first day of what is anticipated to be a six-week trial with substantial implications for similar lawsuits across the United States expected to proceed to trial this year.
The Los Angeles trial will evaluate legal claims made by families who allege their children suffered due to social media use, while the platforms deny liability for user behavior.
Over the coming weeks, testimonies will be heard from experts, family members of children who died, as well as from Mark Zuckerberg, Adam Mosseri—the head of Instagram—and Neal Mohan, CEO of YouTube.
Jurors are also expected to hear from former Meta employees who resigned and became whistleblowers concerning social media addiction among children.
The trial's outcome could establish a precedent for monetary damages, potentially affecting thousands of cases brought by other plaintiffs, their families, state prosecutors, and school districts nationwide.
Monday's session was attended by approximately one hundred spectators, including parents who believe their children died due to decisions made by the companies regarding algorithm design, notifications, and other features.
In their forthcoming opening statements, the technology companies are expected to argue that K.G.M.'s mental health issues were caused by factors unrelated to their platforms, including difficulties she faced during childhood.
The companies also maintain they are not liable for content posted by third parties under federal law.
Snapchat's parent company Snap and TikTok both settled with K.G.M. last month and are no longer defendants in the case.
for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? here.
