Skip to main content
Advertisement

US Supreme Court Blocks Rastafarian Inmate's Lawsuit Over Forced Dreadlock Shaving

The US Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that a former Louisiana inmate cannot sue prison officials for forcibly shaving his Rastafarian dreadlocks, citing limits of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act.

·2 min read
A man with dreadlocks

Rastafarian Hair Symbolism

Growing uncut, uncombed hair into dreadlocks is a symbol of devotion and spiritual growth for Rastafarians.

Supreme Court Ruling

The US Supreme Court has ruled that a former Louisiana inmate cannot sue prison officials who forcibly shaved his dreadlocks in violation of his Rastafarian faith.

In a 6-3 decision, the Court held that Damon Landor, the prisoner, was not entitled to monetary damages under a federal religious freedom statute because it does not apply to individual officials.

The justices explained that state employees did not consent to be sued in their personal capacities when Congress enacted the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) in 2000.

This ruling represents a shift from recent Supreme Court decisions, where the justices have generally favored religious-liberty claims.

Advertisement

Incident Background

In 2020, while serving a sentence for a drug-related offense, Landor was handcuffed to a chair and had his head shaved by officers after he objected, citing that it violated his Rastafarian religious rights.

Landor expressed to USA Today the personal significance of his dreadlocks:

"My dreadlocks are a part of me and part of who I am. So when they cut off my hair, they cut off my crown."

For Rastafarians, growing uncut and uncombed hair into dreadlocks symbolizes spiritual growth and devotion.

Supreme Court Opinions

In the majority opinion issued Tuesday, conservative justices ruled against Landor, while three liberal justices dissented.

Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote that RLUIPA, which applies to local prisons receiving federal funding, does not permit legal actions against individual officials.

"Under the Spending Clause, Congress lacks regulatory authority to impose liability on them directly and must depend instead on consent,"
Gorsuch stated.

In dissent, liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson emphasized the purpose of RLUIPA:

"The goal of RLUIPA was to ensure that state and local prisons respect prisoners' right to religious exercise."

This article was sourced from bbc

Advertisement

Related News