Skip to main content
Advertisement

High Court Rejects Judicial Review on Crowborough Asylum Seeker Camp Plans

A High Court judge has refused a judicial review challenging plans to house over 500 asylum seekers at an army camp in Crowborough, citing premature legal action by the claimants. The decision follows protests and concerns over local impact.

·3 min read
Eddie Mitchell A group of protesters, many with Union Jack flags, marching down a street.

Judicial Review on Asylum Seeker Camp Plans Denied

A judicial review challenging the decision to accommodate asylum seekers at an army camp in Crowborough has been refused by a High Court judge.

The Home Office plans, announced last year, involve housing more than 500 male asylum seekers at the East Sussex camp.

At the Royal Courts of Justice, a judge ruled that the review initiated by the Crowborough Shield residents' group could not proceed following a hearing on Wednesday.

A Home Office spokesperson expressed support for the court's ruling.

Delivering his judgment, the Honourable Mr Justice Mould KC stated that the claimants, Crowborough Shield, had "jumped the gun" by applying for a judicial review prematurely.

During the hearing in London, Home Office lawyers described the challenge as "misconceived" and "premature."

Permission for the judicial review was refused because the challenge was filed before the Home Office made a final decision to use the site for housing asylum seekers, the judge added.

Mr Justice Mould further noted that once the Home Office made its decision in January, the legal claim "should have been discontinued," and he expressed that he could "form no real understanding as to why it was not done."

Advertisement
EPA/Shutterstock A group of people outside court. They are holding a banner.
Campaigners from Crowborough Shield outside the Royal Courts of Justice on Wednesday

Potential for Future Judicial Review

The judge clarified that the final decision to house asylum seekers at the camp remains "amenable to a judicial review." He added:

"There would be no real prejudice to the claimant, or any other putative claimants, in bringing judicial review proceedings against the actual decision made."

Crowborough Shield's Arguments

Representatives for Crowborough Shield argued on Wednesday that decisions regarding the army camp were made without public consultation.

The plans have previously incited protests in Crowborough, with the first group of 27 asylum seekers arriving at the camp in January.

Crowborough Shield also raised concerns that accommodating over 500 asylum seekers could increase pressure on the nearby Ashdown Forest, fearing that camp residents might wander into the woods.

Local Council Response and Protests

A spokesperson for Wealden District Council expressed disappointment with the court's decision and stated the council would seek "urgent legal advice to consider the issues raised in the judgement."

Since the Home Office announcement in October 2025, protesters have organized multiple marches in Crowborough opposing the plans.

Government Policy Context

The plans to house asylum seekers at the Crowborough army camp form part of a broader government initiative to close asylum seeker hotels across the country.

Follow BBC Sussex on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250.

This article was sourced from bbc

Advertisement

Related News